|
|
The ET Question - Do We Really Have A Need To Know?
Source: By Jim Hickman
6th May 2000
I have spent several sleepless nights since first researching this material.
I feel it's content is so important that I must publish this with an
advisory, as parts of this report are very graphic, again I apologize,
but this is composed of true reports, so here goes: Jim Those in power
say "NO" and I think I know why they want to keep their secret a little
longer. I think I am beginning to understand why they can't reveal the
"truth". This report will show that the Air Force has known for decades
that some aliens are just not friendly. Some are here, as one of my
favorite old Twilight Zone shows puts it, "To Serve Man" need I say
more? I will show from previously secret Air Force files, reports from
reliable eyewitnesses and a special report from my friend, Don Ecker
he calls "The Human Mutilation Factor" that it seems that cattle aren't
the only things some aliens are looking for:. People occasionally report
feeling pain or receiving an injury during a UFO encounter or abduction.
Physical effects include eye irritation, sunburn, skin cuts, and sickness.
After the experience, witnesses may have nightmares and feel anxious,
and they may undergo personality changes or changes in their beliefs
about important life issues. Witnesses, especially abductee's, claim
later UFO encounters and other experiences with the paranormal, such
as poltergeist activity or the development of psychic powers. Some people
are now reporting "Alien Implants"; an expert in the field is Dr. Roger
Leir, (visit
site) who has removed several objects from people who have had the
abduction experiences. I received a report from him just the other day:
"I have been very busy with the surgery that was performed on the 5th
of this month. We were able to remove another cantaloupe seed type implant.
We also were able to investigate numerous other aspects of this case
including some of the physiological aspects and in addition were able
to look into some of the electronic emissions coming from the object."
Some of Dr. Leir's findings are quite remarkable. "The findings of these
implant surgeries are highly unusual," reported Dr. Leir. "In all these
cases, there was virtually no inflammatory response." This is not the
usual finding in foreign tissue reactions. Normally, foreign bodies
embedded in tissues result in some type of acute or chronic inflammatory
response, and may include fibrosis and cyst formation. Such was not
the case here. The pathology reports of the first two surgeries revealed
that the metallic objects were encased in a very dense, tough, grey
membrane consisting of proteinaceous coagulum, hemoseridin and pure
keratin. More simply, blood protein and skin cells that are usually
found in the superficial layer of the skin. The tough, biological "cocoons"
encasing the implants were also found to contain nerve proprioceptors
- nerve and pressure cells of the wrong tissue type for that part of
the body. These implant cocoons also fluoresced a bright green color
in the presence of an ultraviolet light source. The implants from the
two women from the second set of surgeries did not exhibit metallic
properties like the implants from the first set of surgeries. In fact,
the spheroid, whitish objects did not contain the tough, biological
outer jackets, or fluoresce from a UV light source. These types of implants
(possibly biological) also lacked the expected inflammatory response,
according to the pathology reports. The crystalline-like object excised
from the foot in the most recent surgery, also lacked the tough, grey,
outer membrane and had virtually no inflammatory response, as in the
other implant surgeries. Test results from the first set of implants
revealed that the lammelar, needle shaped metallic objects in question
are basically meteoric in origin, containing at least eleven different
elements. Alien Implants are just the tip of this story. UFO researcher
Don Ecker reports that over the years, there have been numerous cases
where the phenomenon has figured into human deaths, but as a rule, most
cases have been officially ruled accidental. He continues in his report,
"the matter of either overt or covert hostility on the part of UFOs
has always been treated warily by serious researchers. On the one hand,
if the enigma is hostile, then several questions must be faced. What
if anything should the powers in authority tell the public? Is the government
capable of handling a threat of this type? Is the public ready to face
an issue as potentially terrifying as a "possible threat from somewhere
else?" Don has a good point! Do we really want to know this kind of
secret? I sure don't. I have to sleep at night! That's one secret that
the government can keep! He states, "I had been warned by a prominent
Ufologist, that there was a lid "screwed down tighter than you would
believe in regards to human mutes." Continuing, "In one of the less
well known cases, during the mid 1950's, a military jet interceptor
was observed on radar being "absorbed" into a UFO over the Great Lakes.
No trace of pilot or aircraft was ever found. In another case reported
in the excellent work "Clear Intent" was the case of the "Cuban MIG
Incident". In this case a Cuban MIG was locking on his weapons radar
when the aircraft exploded in mid-air. The wing man was certain that
the UFO had fired some type of weapon, but other than the jet exploding,
no other smoke, flame or other obvious weapon firing was observed."
Don states "I was once again speaking to Don Mason, when he informed
me that the investigator that had been assigned to the above mentioned
case had come across a very mysterious death of a man back in 1979.
According to the report, two hunters in the Bliss and Jerome area of
Idaho had literally stumbled across the nude body of a man that had
been hideously mutilated. The body was in the literal middle of nowhere,
nude except for a pair of underpants, his sexual organs had been removed,
his lips sliced off, and several other classic mutilation cuts. Although
he was in very rugged country, his bare feet were not marked as if he
had walked in that terrain, but yet no other tracks, animal or human
were evident anywhere. After the police were notified, an intensive
search was mounted, and miles away, the mans possessions were recovered,
yet no one yet knows how the body ended up where it was found, or even
more importantly, what happened to him. It should be noted that this
area also had over the years, many unexplained UFO reports and cattle
mutilations." Dr. J. Allen Hynek has stated that on several occasions,
he specified that he wanted no mention of the dozens of human abductions
that they had already uncovered at that time, Hynek was afraid of the
adverse publicity if word of this aspect leaked out to the public. Another
good example of a very unkind alien encounter is the case of Sgt. Jonathan
P Louette, who was stationed at White Sands missile test range in1956
and whose mutilated body was found on the range three days after an
Air Force major had witnessed his abduction by a "disk shaped" object.
Louette's genitals had been removed, his rectum cored out with surgical
precision and his eyes excised. I have copies of the photos of the body
in this case that were given to me by Col. Steve Wilson. However, I
find them too disturbing to post here. I had my own sighting at White
Sands as many of you know, I'm just glad they left me alone: Moving
on, one of the most famous UFO sightings resulting in injuries to witnesses
involved two women, Betty Cash and Vicki Landrum, and Mrs. Landrum's
grandson, Colby, as they drove along a deserted Texas road during December
1980. In front of them, they saw a huge, brilliant, diamond-shaped object
with flames shooting out from the bottom. Cash stopped the car and got
out to have a better look at the UFO. The object radiated intense heat
that softened the dashboard of her car. Terrified, Cash returned to
the car and with the others, watched the UFO move away. As it did so,
a squadron of helicopters appeared and surrounded the UFO. The witnesses
followed the object and the helicopters until they disappeared in the
distance. By the time the three reached home, all were feeling ill.
Within a few hours, they developed sunburn-like blisters, nausea, and
diarrhea. Betty Cash's symptoms were the most severe, and she eventually
sought medical treatment and was hospitalized as a burn victim. Her
doctor concluded Cash was exhibiting symptoms of radiation sickness.
The witnesses later sued the United States government, claiming it was
responsible for their injuries. (They had identified the helicopters
as Chinook twin-rotor helicopters used by the U.S. Army.) Their lawsuit
was unsuccessful because they could never prove the UFO or the helicopters
were devices owned and operated by the American government. Some say
that Aliens are friendly, gentle and kind, but I would ask you to consider
the Mantell case. The Air Force wants you to believe that Capt. Tom
Mantell had seen Venus, and then he had intercepted a weather balloon!
We know better don't we? I have included the report for those not familiar
with this incident. January 7, 1948 Captain Thomas Mantell (USAF) crashes
in his F-51 Mustang while allegedly pursuing a UFO. On the afternoon
of January 7, 1948, a control tower operator at Godman Air Force Base,
in Kentucky, answered the telephone. It was an innocent enough action,
surely, but was nevertheless destined to set a series of events in motion
that ultimately would lead one man to his death. The call was from an
officer of the Kentucky State Patrol, who wanted to know if Godman was
aware of any unusual aerial activity in the vicinity. Godman knew of
no activity in the area, and a quick check with Wright-Patterson AFB
Flight Service in Ohio confirmed that there were no scheduled flights.
Nevertheless, the state patrol was back on the phone to Godman about
twenty minutes later, reporting that individuals in Owensboro and Irvington,
Kentucky, were seeing a strange object in the sky. This unidentified
object was described by the witnesses as 250-300 feet in diameter, moving
rapidly in a westerly direction. At precisely 1:45 in the afternoon,
the tower operators at Godman were seeing the object. Certain that it
was not a balloon they called flight operations. Soon, word of the strange
object in the sky over Kentucky had spread across the base, and the
base commander, Colonel Hix, came to the control tower to see the object
for himself. Around 2:30, the men in the tower were beginning to talk
about possible courses of action to deal with the anomaly in the sky
above. By happenstance, at that very moment, four F-51 Mustangs were
approaching the base. The tower operator spoke to the flight leader,
a Captain Thomas Mantell, and asked him to have a look at the object.
Mantell agreed, and he and two of his wingmen turned their airplanes
around and headed for the object, while the fourth pilot, his craft
low on fuel, continued on to land at its base. The planes labored upwards
to 10,000 feet, with Mantell pulling out in the lead. At 2:45 PM, Mantell
radioed the tower: "I see something above and ahead of me, and I'm still
climbing. " Moments later, one of his wingmen was overheard radioing
Mantell: "What in the hell are you looking for?" Some UFO researchers
claim that Mantell radioed back, saying "I've sighted the thing. It
looks metallic, and it's tremendous in size..." The tower operators,
according to Captain Edward Ruppelt's account in The Report on Unidentified
Flying objects, never agreed among themselves that Mantell actually
said this. However, they did agree that Mantell said, a few seconds
later, "It's above me and I'm gaining on it. I'm going to 20,000 feet."
Shortly after that last transmission Mantell's F-51 came hurtling down
from the sky, and spread itself across the landscape. At 3:52 P.M.,
a telephone at Godman Air Force Base rang. Captain Thomas Mantell was
dead. The opinion of the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) at
that time was given as follows: It is the [ATIC] opinion that Captain
Mantell lost consciousness due to oxygen starvation, the aircraft being
trimmed continued to climb until increasing altitude caused a sufficient
loss of power for it to level out. The aircraft then began a turn to
the left due to torque and as the wing drooped so did the nose until
the aircraft was in a tight diving spiral. The uncontrolled descent
resulted in excessive speed causing the aircraft to disintegrate. It
is believed that Captain Mantell never regained consciousness. This
is born out by the fact that the canopy lock was still in place after
the crash, discounting any attempt to abandon the aircraft. The UFO
was in no way directly responsible for this experienced pilot conducting
high altitude flight without the necessary oxygen equipment. The Air
Force posited that Mantell had spied Venus, then at 33 above the southern
horizon. The Venus explanation has been frowned upon by a host of UFOlogists,
most notably the late J. Allen Hynek, who aptly noted that, on the date
in question, Venus was only six times brighter than the surrounding
sky. While this sounds like an impressive measure, in practice, an object
only six times brighter than the surrounding sky is very difficult to
see. It most certainly does not rate as a conspicuous sight. Therefore,
I am inclined to side with those skeptical of the Venus explanation.
However, that Mantell may have chased a Skyhook balloon, then a classified
naval research project, is a distinct possibility. Skyhook balloons
were, in fact, being released from Clinton County Air Force base in
Ohio around that time, and a wind plot for January 7, 1948, revealed
that the track of such a balloon on that day would have carried it near
Godman Field in Kentucky. In a strange occurrence Skyhook plays several
roles in Ufology, did you know that Major Donald Keyhoe of NICAP fame
wrote about Project Skyhook in New Mexico, and it was invaded by UFO's.
This was later made into a movie called, "Earth vs. the Flying Saucers"
back in the early 50's. Unfortunately, there appears to be some confusion
as to whether a Skyhook was actually launched from Clinton County AFB
on January 7, 1948. In Brad Steiger's synopsis of the Air Force UFO
projects, commentary is found to the effect that "...it was subsequently
determined that on the date of the Godman sighting a balloon was released
by the Navy from Clinton County Airport in Ohio." I would say that Capt
Mantell had a close encounter with a non-friendly alien. Another report
of an attacking alien comes in from the Cleveland Press, thanks to investigator
DANIEL WILSON of Painesville, Ohio for this story: "Saucer Attacked
Me, Pilot Declares" The Cleveland Press, Wednesday, July 30, 1952 By
Charles Tracy, Aviation Editor Within minutes after his hair-raising
experience, I talked to a veteran Air Force pilot who excitedly reported
that his F-51 fighter plane was attacked repeatedly by a flying saucer.
The incident, never before revealed to the public, occurred a year ago
at 8000 feet over Augusta, Ga., on a warm, sunny, clear day. The pilot's
own startling story is in the files in Washington. I never saw the official
report, and in repeating the pilot's conversation with me, I am violating
no security. The pilot was First Lieut. George Kinman of Birmingham,
Ala., veteran of seven year's service, including action in World War
II. He was stationed at Lawson Air Force Base, Columbus, Ga., with the
117th Tactical Reconnaissance Wing. I was assistant wing operations
officer. (Charles Tracy, an Air Force captain in World War II, was called
back into service in 1950, was discharged five months ago.) Our outfit
was preparing for overseas duty and we were running a lot of practice
missions. We sent photo planes out to get pictures of bridges, airfields,
etc. At times we would dispatch pilots over the harbors to count the
ships and report. This was to test their accuracy in visual reconnaissance.
It was while returning from one of these practice missions that Lieut.
Kinman had the daylights scared out of him. He was over Augusta, about
80 miles or 20 minutes flying time from home base. "I was cruising at
about 250 mph," he told me after making a somewhat shaky landing in
his Mustang, a single-engine job equipped with cameras but no guns.
"All of a sudden I noticed something ahead, closing in on me head- on,"
Kinman reported. "Before I could take evasive action - before I even
thought of it, in fact - this thing dipped abruptly and passed underneath,
just missing my propeller." He described "the thing" as "definetely
of disc shap... white... pretty thick... it looked like an oval... it
was about twice as big as my plane... it had no visible protrusions
like motors, guns, windows, smoke or fire." Kinman said he immediately
turned around but couldn't see anything.(The F-51 Mustang had a bubble
canopy which affords excellent vision in all directions.) Within 15
seconds, he estimated, the disc came directly at him again and once
more dipped suddenly at the last possible moment to avoid a collision.
This happened repeatedly, he said, for five to ten minutes. Each time,
he said, he would look back, but by then the strange object had disappeared.
Kinman tried to put his plane in position to use the cameras in his
fuselage, adjusted to shoot the ground while in level flight. He was
not successful and his films, when developed, showed nothing. "I was
upset and scared by the whole thing," Kinman told me. "While this was
going on I radioed the nearest Civil Aeronautics Authority traffic control
center. (This is routine procedure for a pilot who sights unscheduled
air traffic.) "On its final pass at me, the disc whirled upward. I thought
it was going to take a piece of my canopy with it." Then, he said, it
disappeared. After landing, Kinman, his face chalk-white, walked into
the operations offices at Lawson and told the airdrome officer. "I just
saw something very strange, like a flying saucer. What should I do?"
I was called. I heard part of Kinman's story and informed him the Air
Force had a formal intelligence report he would be requested to fill
out. I stood by as he went over the details with an intelligence officer.
Kinman was reluctant to volunteer details and had to be "pumped." He
seemed to think we'd belittle his reports, maybe think he was out of
his head. He wouldn't estimate the speed of the "disc," but said "it
was awfully fast." Several days later, his report was sent to Washington.
Kinman was called to Macon, Ga., where the Air Materials Command has
a big base, and interviewed by high Air Force officers. Some laughed.
A few fellows at the base, when the story got around, were inclined
to poo-poo the idea. They thought Kinman was pulling a fast one. But
the higher-up officers thought it was a serious incident. Knowing Kinman's
experience, ability, observant powers and reputation for truth, I see
He still is a pilot with the 117th flying jets in Germany. To my knowledge,
Kinman's was the first and only report of an actual attack by a flying
saucer, but the carefully guarded Air Force files may contain stories
to match his. I, for one, wouldn't be surprised. End of article. I received
this report while I was running the Skywatch mailing list for Col. Steve
Wilson; this story is very similar to what's being reported being done
to cattle in the San Luis Valley area by my friend, Chris O'Brien in
his book "The Mysterious Valley". RELATED HOMOCIDE IN BRAZIL THE COMPLETE
STORY Mon, 2 Dec 1996 14:55:12 If this case is authentically UFO-related
- and at this time I have no reason to believe it is not - then all
of us are going to have to reevaluate to one degree or another our tentative
conclusions as to the possible specific intentions, moral perspectives
and general agenda that some of our extraterrestrial visitors may have.
Brazilian ufologist Encarnacion Zapata Garcia and Dr. Rubens Goes have
recently presented a series of sensational photographs, obtained from
police files which mimic the wounds of countless UFO-related animal
mutilation cases that have been reported in Europe and North, Central
and South America since the 1960s. On first glance they would seem to
be ufology's worst nightmare. What is more disturbing is that Brazilian
urologists and police have intimated that there may be at least a dozen
or more cases similar to the recently uncovered Guarapiranga reservoir
case. Obviously if the Guarapiranga data is legitimate, then it becomes
increasingly difficult to maintain the position that all visitors are
demonstrating a relatively friendly attitude toward humans, regardless
of what their specific agenda(s) may be. The Guarapiranga situation
indicates that there is at least one group of alien visitors to the
planet who have a complete disdain for human sensibilities, who, in
fact, could care less about the value of human life. I came to the same
conclusion because all other alternatives were neither supported by
facts nor good logic, whereas the similarities to numerous cattle mutilations
which I had studied in the United States were startling, exactly paralleling
what I have seen many times before. The specifics of the case are as
follows: Encarnacion Garcia learned from her friend, Dr. Rubens Goes,
that he was in possession of some rather "odd" photos which had been
given to him by his cousin, police technician, Rubens Sergio. These
were official photos of a body that had been found near Guarapiranga
reservoir on the 29th of September 1988, of an unnamed male who was,
however, later identified. The name of this man has been withheld from
all media investigators, including UFO investigators, at the request
of his relatives. After studying the photos, Encarnacion Garcia was
impressed with how similar the wounds of the body were to those found
on the carcasses of so many UFO-related mutilated animals... Note: I
am going to edit out the most disturbing parts of this autopsy report:
The body was in perfect condition. Rigor mortis had not set in and it
was estimated that the victim had been killed approximately 48 to 72
hours previously. There were no signs of animal predation or putrefaction
that might be expected. Strangely, there was no odor to the cadaver.
Bleeding from the wounds had been minimal. The black coloration found
in the face area and in other places within the photo is partly due
to low light exposure when this photo and others were taken. It is also
partly due to coagulated blood in the wound areas. As can clearly be
seen, flesh and lips have been excised around the mandibles, as is common
in cattle and other animal mutilations, the autopsy report noted, "the
eyes and ears were also removed and the mouth cavity was emptied." Removal
of these body parts, including the tongue as here, is common enough
in animal mutilation cases. The autopsy report states: "There has been
a removal of extensive tissue along many parts of the face, head and
neck of the victim... There has also been extraction of ocular tissue,
eyes, internal and external organs (ears) and entire parts of the head.
The tongue and several muscles were also extracted." The kinds of cuts
on the cadaver are what we have come to expect in UFO-related animal
mutilation cases. Of primary interest is their precision. The "surgery"
(or butchery, if you will) was done with agility and care and probably
with speed. The lack of profuse bleeding suggests the use of a laser-like
instrument producing acute heat, thus cauterizing almost immediately
the edge of the wounds. It is probable that even some of the internal
organs of the man could have been removed through this incision." What
is most compelling about the anal incision and the extraction of anal
and digestive tract tissue is that it is a carbon copy of the surgery
we have seen in so many UFO-related animal mutilation cases. Here is
an example of that type of mutilation done to cattle in a report from
Chris O'Brien's site:
Gelding Found Mutilated South of Alamosa Wed December 17, 1997, at 10:30
a.m. 5 Miles SW of Alamosa, SLV CO MUTE Rancher Ron Gardiner discovered
a dead gelding 5 miles SW of Alamosa, CO, in the San Luis Valley So-Cen
CO/No-Cen NM. The animal was still warm and the rancher estimated the
animal was killed and mutilated sometime around dawn. The horse was
missing its penis and an 8-inch circular patch of hide behind the sheath--
which was intact. The rear-end was neatly cored out in a slightly elongated
circle to a depth of 8 to 9 inches. Eyes and tongue were intact. The
animal was found lying on its right side at the bottom of a dry, 7-foot
deep irrigation canal channel. There was evidence of a struggle i.e.,
broken chimisa bushes and thrashing marks, but besides the unfortunate
gelding's tracks, there were no other tracks present. No apparent scavenger
interest noted and two horses in the small herd seemed curious and unafraid
of the carcass. The carcass did not bloat. No downside incisions or
additional evidence noted by the rancher, this investigator, or the
Alamosa County Sheriff investigator, but a 5-inch shallow gash in the
hide was present on the neck. Several drops, which appeared to be blood
was found in snow about 60 feet away over the fence and across the road.
I hope this report isn't too disturbing, I just wish it weren't true!
Jim Hickman Director
Aerial
Phenomena Research Group Homepage,
CAUS-Staff/Consultant (visit
site),
CUFOS-Associate (visit
site)
Email: aerial@itlnet.net
Host-The Hickman Report "Klaatu
Barada Nictu"
|
Earth
Environment
Health
Interviews
Lost Civilizations
Mysteries, UFOs, etc.
Sacred Sites
Sci/Tech/Nature
Space
Ascended
Masters
Merkabah Meditation
Sacred Geometry
Live
Seismic Monitor
Wild
Weather 2000-2001
More
Informer News ... |
